Introduction: The Illusion of Success, the Reality of Theft

While ordinary people rise early, punch clocks, stretch their pay checks, and teach their children to value hard work, a select few sip champagne at rooftop galas, fund movies with stolen public money, and decorate their deception with glossy words like “integrity” and “philanthropy.”

This is not fiction. This is the real world. This is a world in which individuals such as Jho Low and his associates not only pilfer billions, but also deprive people of their dignity, trust, and prospects.

The 1MDB scandal is not just the story of a financial fraud. It is a cold mirror held up to modern society, reflecting how a global elite—bankers, politicians, and celebrities—colluded, knowingly or not, in laundering one of the greatest heists of the 21st century. 

It is a masterclass in deception, a playbook in social engineering, and a tragedy measured not only in dollars but in broken public faith.

As someone who grew up under communism and later worked as an intelligence operative and interrogator, I’ve seen this pattern repeat again and again. 

Systems built on the backs of the working class are hijacked by those who know how to manipulate power, language, and illusion. 

These men don’t rob banks with masks—they sign contracts in tailored suits and smile for the camera while quietly emptying national treasuries.

They speak of “vision,” “nation-building,” and “growth.” However, they are secretly orchestrating theft. 

And what makes this scandal even more dangerous is the way it cloaked itself in success—bond deals, luxury real estate, global investments, red-carpet events, and Oscar-winning films. It used the very symbols of trust and aspiration to commit betrayal on an international scale.

In this article, we will examine the full anatomy of the 1MDB scandal: from its origins in Malaysia to its manipulation by Goldman Sachs, from the charming fugitive Jho Low to the Hollywood icons unknowingly used as shields. 

We will track the money, uncover the strategies, and pose the challenging question: how many more scams similar to this one remain concealed behind a façade?

• 2009: Najib Razak, Malaysia’s newly elected Prime Minister, launches the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), a sovereign wealth fund aimed at driving economic growth. Jho Low, a young financier, is already exerting significant influence behind the scenes.

• 2012–2013: Goldman Sachs, through bankers Tim Leissner and Roger Ng, arranges three bond offerings, raising $6.5 billion for 1MDB. The stated objective is to fund national development. In reality, the money begins to disappear into shell companies and private accounts.

• 2013–2015: Jho Low throws lavish parties in Cannes and Las Vegas. Millions are spent on real estate, art, champagne, and celebrity access. Leonardo DiCaprio receives donations for his foundation. The Wolf of Wall Street is financed. The lifestyle is opulent—and paid for by Malaysian taxpayers

• 2015–2016: Whistleblowers and journalists, including The Wall Street Journal, uncover major discrepancies. $681 million is found in Najib’s personal bank account. Political cover-ups begin. Investigators are fired. Public outrage erupts in Malaysia.

• 2016–2018: The U.S. Department of Justice launches its largest ever kleptocracy investigation. Billions in assets are seized globally. Goldman Sachs faces scrutiny. Leissner pleads guilty. Roger Ng is extradited. Jho Low disappears—rumored to be in China.

• 2022–2025: Najib Razak is convicted and sentenced to 12 years in prison. Roger Ng receives 10 years. In May 2025, Tim Leissner is sentenced to two years for his role—despite confessing to bribery and document forgery. Jho Low remains a fugitive.

Jho Low: The Phantom Mastermind

Most people only knew Jho Low as a mysterious figure. He wasn’t listed as a 1MDB official. He didn’t work at Goldman Sachs. He never gave press conferences. And yet—nothing in the 1MDB scandal happened without him.

From its inception in 2009, Jho Low was the true architect of 1MDB. He sold the dream of global investment and nation-building to Malaysian leaders, particularly to Prime Minister Najib Razak and his stepson Riza Aziz. But beneath the glittering dream was a sinister strategy.

How He Engineered the Scam

• Strategic Access: Low used his elite connections—including Gulf royals and Malaysian political families—to position himself as a trusted adviser, without ever taking formal accountability.

• Creating Fake Companies: He personally set up shell companies such as Good Star Ltd., Tanore Finance, and the fake Aabar Investments PJS Ltd.—designed to closely mimic real firms and deceive banking compliance departments.

• Bond Manipulation: Low collaborated directly with Tim Leissner and Roger Ng to raise $6.5 billion through Goldman Sachs bond deals, offering abnormal fees in exchange for discretion and speed.

• Laundering Through Luxury: The stolen funds were rapidly converted into real estate, yachts, diamonds, and art, creating both a luxurious lifestyle and a financial firewall. These purchases helped mask the illicit origins of the money.

• Bribes and Influence: Low orchestrated payments to officials in Malaysia and Abu Dhabi to facilitate the fraud. He understood that corruption wasn’t a side effect—it was a requirement.

Jho Low was not reacting to a flawed system—he designed the system, executed the operation, and manipulated the world to applaud him for it.
“This wasn’t just money laundering. It was reputation laundering—at a scale the world had never seen.” — U.S. DOJ Investigator, 2020

The Celebrity Bait: Hollywood, Fame & The Illusion of Honor

Jho Low’s greatest innovation was not financial—it was psychological. He knew that money alone doesn’t buy trust, but proximity to fame does.

• He donated millions to Leonardo DiCaprio’s environmental foundation.

• He financed Martin Scorsese’s The Wolf of Wall Street through Red Granite Pictures.

• He gifted DiCaprio a Picasso, a Basquiat, and Marlon Brando’s Oscar—all later seized by U.S. authorities. 

Other celebrities in his orbit included

• Miranda Kerr was gifted $8 million in diamonds.

• Paris Hilton, regularly flown to private events.

• Alicia Keys, Jamie Foxx, and other artists were paid to perform at private galas.

These relationships weren’t incidental. They were part of the illusion. If Jho Low could stand next to Leo on a red carpet or sit with Hollywood royalty at Cannes, then who would dare call him a thief?

Leonardo DiCaprio, to his credit, fully cooperated with authorities and returned all gifts. He made it clear he was unaware the money came from stolen funds.

But this is the point—Low was buying social camouflage. His friendships with Hollywood elites gave him the appearance of legitimacy and insulated him from scrutiny until it was too late.

Anatomy of Deception: How the Scam Worked

1. Goldman Sachs and the Bond Heist

Goldman Sachs charged an extraordinary $600 million to arrange three bond deals. These bonds raised $6.5 billion for 1MDB, but within weeks, large sums were redirected to offshore accounts. Internal Goldman emails raised red flags, but no action was taken.

Tim Leissner admitted to faking documents, bribing officials, and creating false audit trails. Roger Ng facilitated the flow of funds to shell companies. The bank eventually paid over $6.8 billion in penalties.

2. The Shell Company Carousel

The stolen funds were funneled through a network of fraudulent entities:

• Good Star Ltd (Seychelles)

• Aabar Investments PJS Ltd (fake Abu Dhabi entity)

• Tanore Finance Corporation

These were designed to mirror legitimate institutions. By the time the money reached real estate agents in New York or filmmakers in Hollywood, it was impossible to trace its original source.

3. Political Protection

Najib Razak wielded absolute power. He removed Malaysia’s attorney general, disbanded investigating bodies, and silenced critics. 

The Prime Minister’s Office became both the architect and protector of the scam. 1MDB wasn’t a blunder—it was a weaponized financial machine used to consolidate power.

The Cost: Malaysia’s Bleeding Wounds

While Jho Low commissioned Monet paintings, ordinary Malaysians suffered:

• National debt soared to over RM 50 billion.

• The Ringgit fell to historic lows.

• Public services weakened, with schools and hospitals left underfunded. 

The pain wasn’t just financial—it was emotional. Trust in government evaporated. The idea of “nation-building” became a joke. And even today, many Malaysians wonder: where else has the money gone?

Conclusion

As someone who has interviewed war criminals, investigated corporate espionage, and interrogated professional liars, I can tell you this: the most dangerous frauds don’t scream—they whisper.

1MDB is a blueprint. A masterclass. It shows how systemic corruption feeds off silence, spectacle, and status.

It is a reminder that we must not be hypnotized by titles or tuxedos. Not all fame equates to virtue. Success that lacks scrutiny is often a sign of decay.

So we must ask, in every nation, in every institution:

• Who handles our money?

• Who audits their actions?

• And what stories are being told to hide the theft?

Introduction 

When I was a young man growing up behind the Iron Curtain, truth was a rare currency, and deception was often a tool of survival. 

But what always amazed me—whether I was interrogating spies, investigating corruption, or peeling back the mask of an informant—was how little the mechanics of deception ever truly change.

History doesn’t just repeat; it adapts. 

And in the world of scams, there is no better example than the legendary con known as The Spanish Prisoner—a scam so old, so elegant in its design, that it continues to thrive under new names in our digital age.

Today, we call it the Nigerian Prince scam. 

But the heart of it? It hasn’t changed in over 200 years.

A Gentleman in Distress: The Birth of the Spanish Prisoner

The earliest records of the Spanish Prisoner scam date back to the late 18th and early 19th centuries. 

One of the earliest mentions appears in The New York Times archives from the 1890s, describing letters sent to wealthy American businessmen. 

The premise was always the same: A wealthy man of noble descent was being unjustly held in a Spanish prison. He could not reveal his identity due to political danger. 

But if the recipient—the target—could discreetly fund his release, untold riches awaited as a reward.

A 1906 case from Grand Forks, North Dakota, reveals how personal these appeals could be. 

A local man received a letter from a supposed young girl, orphaned after her wealthy Spanish father died in prison. 

She needed financial help to flee the country and access a secret fortune. In return, she promised to share the inheritance. 

It was a script designed to appeal to the rescuer instinct—to evoke both sympathy and greed.

But the money was never real. The girl didn’t exist. And who was the sender? The sender was likely one of many international conmen operating by mail.

Anatomy of the Scam: How and Why It Works

Over the years in my professional career—whether protecting organizations from insider threats or unravelling intelligence deceptions—I’ve seen how effective manipulation relies not on facts, but on emotion.

Scams like the Spanish Prisoner don’t rely on complex hacking tools or sophisticated phishing software. They succeed because of what we might call emotional malware.

The mechanics are classic:

1. They tell a compelling story of desperation and urgency.

2. The promise of a substantial reward is present.

3. The story presents a moral dilemma: whether to provide assistance or not.

4. An incremental financial ask.

This four-step formula is nearly bulletproof because it targets two psychological vulnerabilities: empathy and greed. 

The con artist walks the line between victim and benefactor, evoking trust and disarming suspicion. As soon as the first payment is made, the victim becomes emotionally—and psychologically—invested. 

They must believe it’s real… because to admit it’s a lie would mean admitting their own gullibility.

From Letters to Laptops: The Digital Resurrection

In 1992, a new scam emerged, one that most of us are now familiar with: the Nigerian Prince.

Emails began circulating from supposed African royalty or government officials trapped in political limbo, needing help to move millions out of the country. 

The victim, again, was promised a share of the fortune for their help. According to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), these “advance-fee fraud” schemes still generate tens of millions in losses annually.

The psychological tactics are the same. The only thing that changed was the medium.

In one particularly disturbing case reported by Slate Magazine, a woman in her late 60s from the United States believed she was in communication with a wealthy Nigerian businessman who wanted to marry her. 

Over the course of 18 months, she wired him over $250,000 to help him escape legal troubles and transfer his fortune. 

She lost her life savings. Her family only found out when the woman tried to take out a second mortgage on her home.

Let’s be clear: the incident was not about stupidity. It was about emotional manipulation layered with deception. 

She believed she was helping someone she loved. And that’s what makes these scams dangerous—they don’t just empty wallets. They break hearts, ruin families, and destroy dignity.

Education is the shield against manipulation

Let me say this clearly: No amount of cyber-defence, firewall, or VPN will protect a person from a lie they are emotionally ready to believe.

This is why education serves as the primary defence.

In my lectures on social engineering, I emphasize the importance of pattern recognition. 

Once you know how cons work—once you see the architecture of the lie—you’re far less likely to fall for it.

Here are some key indicators of an advance-fee scam:

• Unsolicited messages that promise large sums of money are indicative of an advance-fee scam.

• Narratives involving political risk or concealed inheritances are prevalent.

• Requests for immediate financial assistance to gain access to more substantial rewards are also common.

• The communication is characterized by poor grammar, odd phrasing, and a strong sense of secrecy.

• There is pressure to maintain the confidentiality of the communication.

The moment you feel like you’re part of a secret—you are being manipulated.

Why People Keep Falling for It

Despite decades of warnings, people still fall for these scams. Why?

Scammers use hope, not logic, as their greatest weapon.

Hope for a better life. Hope to be the hero. I hope that someone needs you. This scam focuses not on your ignorance but on your humanity.

And often, scammers target the elderly, the isolated, or those financially vulnerable. 

People like that aren’t just easier to fool—they want to believe that someone out there sees their worth. The scam becomes a twisted form of validation.

I often say, “A lie only works if it offers you something you want to hear.”

Conclusion

In the trenches of war, in interrogation rooms, and now behind this microphone, I have seen the power of stories—the good and the bad. 

And the Spanish Prisoner is one of the oldest stories still weaponized against the unsuspecting.

Scams like these endure because human emotion endures.

But knowledge is power. If we can teach people how crime operates—not just what it looks like, but how it feels—then we give them armour. 

And that’s what Life the Battlefield is all about: helping people to be seen, heard, and protected.

Introduction 

It goes without saying — I approached this topic from two critical angles, both of which culminate in a single red flag I can no longer ignore.

Firstly, it is evident that information holds the highest value in business, surpassing talent, technology, and time.

And over the past 15 years as a business owner — following a career forged in intelligence, counterintelligence, and diplomatic environments—I’ve seen things most professionals wouldn’t believe.

I’ve been offered virtual assistants more times than I can count—usually by someone with a polished smile, pitching a business model built on distant labour, low costs, and high efficiency.

The catch?

I’m expected to hire someone I’ll likely never meet in real life — to entrust them with my calendar, inbox, clients, and often my intellectual property.

When I ask why I need a VA, the answers come fast and sweet: “It will save you time and money.” That’s it. That’s the sales pitch. Reduced admin costs and more time for meetings. Boom. Done.

But that logic — while seductive — never sat right with me. 

Perhaps it’s my background: educated under communism, trained in military intelligence and diplomacy, where guarding information wasn’t just good business — it was survival.

So, forgive me if I find it difficult to entrust my most critical business assets—information and reputation—to a stranger halfway across the globe, based solely on someone else’s PowerPoint and a few client testimonials.

The Illusion of Savings: What You Risk When You Outsource Trust

On the surface, virtual assistants offer efficiency and savings. 

You can hire someone offshore for a fraction of a local salary, and with tools like Zoom, Trello, and Slack, they’re just a click away.

But what happens when the very person managing your inbox is also siphoning off client lists, forwarding sensitive emails to third parties, or selling your intellectual property on dark web forums?

In the realm of espionage and intelligence, it’s crucial to remember that any point of access can potentially lead to compromise. 

And yet, many businesses today hand over passwords, cloud access, and internal documents to VAs with no vetting, no NDAs, and no real oversight.

Recently, I travelled to Bali—not for a holiday, but on a quiet field investigation. I wanted to understand who these digital nomads really the remote workers are running businesses by the pool, heads buried in MacBooks, posting hashtags like #hustlefromparadise. 

What I found was both fascinating and deeply concerning.

At a popular co-working café in Canggu, I struck up a conversation with a young man from Europe who said he “managed client funnels” for Australian real estate coaches. When I asked how he secured their information, he shrugged and said, “I mean… it’s all in Google Drive. I just try not to lose my laptop.”

Later that week, I met a woman in Seminyak who worked as a VA for multiple e-commerce stores. She openly admitted that she used the same password manager for all her clients and often worked from beach bars because “the vibes are better.” When I asked if her clients were aware of this, she laughed and said, “They trust me. Why wouldn’t they?”

That’s precisely the problem.

Trust, in this digital landscape, is too often based on aesthetics—not accountability. 

The polished Instagram feed, the time zone-friendly calendar, the upbeat Zoom call—it all looks legitimate. 

Until one day, your client list is sold, your inbox is compromised, or your operations grind to a halt.

Hiring a virtual assistant—or anyone who operates remotely—without asking the hard questions is like giving the keys to your house to a stranger because they smiled nicely on Zoom.

Communication Breakdown: More Than Just Lost in Translation

One of the most reported pain points in hiring virtual assistants (VAs) is communication. On the surface, this may seem like an issue of time zones or language. But it’s far deeper than that.

Many clients underestimate how much business relies on nuance—tone, context, timing, and even cultural knowledge. A poorly worded email can damage a client relationship. 

A missed cue in a negotiation call can cost a deal. When your VA doesn’t understand your industry, language, or expectations fully, every interaction becomes a risk vector.

Worse, miscommunication can obscure critical early red flags—signs of dishonesty, incompetence, or disinterest—until it’s too late.

Consider the case of a real estate agency that partnered with a virtual assistant to manage property listings and client communications. Initially, the collaboration aimed to streamline operations and enhance customer service. However, challenges soon emerged. 

The VA, unfamiliar with the local real estate terminology and market nuances, miscommunicated property details to potential clients. 

This led to confusion, missed opportunities, and a decline in client trust.

The agency’s experience highlights a crucial lesson: effective communication in real estate isn’t just about language proficiency; it’s about cultural and contextual understanding. Without it, even the most well-intentioned efforts can backfire, damaging relationships and reputations.

Reference: 360 Web Solutions UK Case Study

The Productivity Mirage: Remote Work Isn’t Always Working

We live in a world that worships productivity. However, beneath the polished Instagram photos of laptops by the beach, the reality is that many virtual assistants are juggling multiple clients, battling distractions at home, or simply unqualified for the tasks assigned.

In my investigative work, I’ve seen VAs outsource their tasks to cheaper freelancers, creating a dangerous chain of unknown hands handling sensitive information. 

One investigation uncovered a VA who hired their own VA from a third country, who then saved client files to unsecured personal drives.

By the time the client realized something was wrong, their internal sales strategy had been leaked to a competitor—all without a single line of code being hacked. Just poor judgment and invisible delegation.

Data in the Wrong Hands: The Silent Breach No One Sees Coming

Let’s be clear: data is currency. 

Your virtual assistant (VA) frequently has access to information, ranging from business emails and customer databases to strategic documents and financial records, which, if misused, could potentially damage your reputation, operations, or both.

Unlike traditional employees, most VAs operate outside of national labor protections, background checks, or regulatory frameworks. 

There is no HR department, no cybersecurity team monitoring their access, and often no legal recourse if something goes wrong—especially if they’re halfway around the world.

Cybercriminals understand this vulnerability. Increasingly, they are targeting VAs with phishing campaigns, malware, or direct bribery. 

A notable incident involved a London-based outsourcing firm, Virtual Mail Room, which managed sensitive correspondence for various clients, including banks and local councils. 

Due to lax security measures, over 50,000 confidential letters were inadvertently exposed online, accessible through a simple Google search. 

The breach included personal details such as names, addresses, and types of correspondence, that affected individuals in the UK, US, and Canada. 

This incident underscores the critical importance of stringent data security protocols when outsourcing tasks involving sensitive information.

The breach didn’t come from a hacker in a hoodie—it came from a smiling assistant with a Gmail address and a calendar link.

Weaponized Trust: The New Modus Operandi of Exploitation

Scammers today don’t need to steal passwords—they earn them.

Social engineering is the art of manipulating people into providing access willingly. And in the virtual assistant world, it’s the perfect Trojan horse. A charming VA, attentive and obedient, becomes your digital shadow. 

You begin to trust them. You relax. You overshare.

It begins with simple things: your birthday, your kids’ names, and your travel plans. 

Over time, they accumulate enough data to impersonate you, access your accounts, or even blackmail you.

As someone who has trained and operated in high-level interrogation and social engineering scenarios, I can tell you: the greatest threat isn’t the criminal you see—it’s the one who’s already inside your system, with your permission.

But Don’t They Work for Pennies? The Cost of Cheap Labor

Many people rationalize the risk: “But I’m only paying $7/hour.” That cost may seem low—until you count the hours spent fixing errors, chasing missed deadlines, or dealing with reputational fallout.

If your business is your battlefield, then your VA is either your trusted ally… or the spy in your camp. And in war, as in business, allies without loyalty are more dangerous than known enemies.

When It Can Work: The Other Side of the Coin

Let’s be fair—not all virtual assistants are threats. Some are highly skilled, loyal, and transformative. But the difference lies in the process:

• Rigorous screening (not just a five-minute video call)

• Background checks and verifiable references

• Clear SOPs, contracts, and secure systems

• Ongoing performance reviews

• Zero-access policy until trust is earned

In the military and intelligence world, we don’t grant full access on day one—we test. Trust must be earned, not assumed.

Delegate the Task, Not the Responsibility

Hiring a virtual assistant can be powerful—but only if done with the same scrutiny, structure, and foresight you’d use for an in-house hire.

In the end, the biggest danger is not the VA. It’s the illusion that outsourcing responsibility means outsourcing risk. It doesn’t.

As someone who has interrogated spies, advised CEOs, and seen the worst-case scenarios unfold—my advice is simple:

Trust, but verify. Vet, before you delegate. And never forget that behind every screen is a human—capable of loyalty or betrayal.

Introduction

Perhaps you are wondering how much perpetrators know about overcoming cybersecurity systems that are supposedly protecting you, me, and everyone else—our bank accounts, personal data, computer integrity, and mobile security.

Let me take you back in time. In the 1970s, a criminal had to be physically innovative—picking locks, cutting wires, or cracking safes.

Back then, there was no manual or YouTube tutorial for bypassing alarms. But today? Criminals read. For free. With precision.

Please don’t tell yourself it’s not true—because it is. Scammers, fraudsters, and so-called influencers no longer need mentors.

All they need is Wi-Fi. They scroll TikTok, browse Telegram, and skim LinkedIn for tactics on how to bypass fraud detection, spoof credentials, and recover hacked accounts.

They don’t just hide in basements; they attend networking events, sipping cocktails and collecting insider knowledge from the very people they’re targeting.

In our last investigation, we explored the criminal’s evolution—from pickpockets in crowded city streets to deepfake engineers operating across international borders.

But now we confront a more unsettling truth: the next generation of scammers, fraudsters, and manipulators isn’t hiding in the dark—they’re being trained in plain sight.

Welcome to the feed—where influencers, algorithms, and digital platforms double as criminal classrooms.

The New Digital Classroom

You don’t need to know a hacker to become one. All you need is curiosity, a device, and a social platform.

Telegram channels offering step-by-step fraud tutorials now boast hundreds of thousands of members.

Discord servers walk users through phishing software setups.

TikTok influencers (some just teenagers) offer content on how to create fake IDs, build drop-shipping scams, or manipulate bank verification systems.

Cybersecurity firm NortonLifeLock reported in 2023 that instructional scam content on social media increased by 200% in just one year.

Europol has warned that recruitment into cybercrime syndicates via Instagram and Telegram has risen more than 300% since 2021.

Even Quora and Reddit host discussions that border on criminal guidance. What was once whispered in prison yards is now explained—complete with hashtags and how-to videos.

What’s the most concerning aspect? Much of it isn’t even illegal until it’s acted on.

From Influencer to Fraudfluencer

Some of the internet’s most adored influencers are pushing products, advice, and personas rooted in deception.

Fitness influencers are among the most trusted and widely followed personalities online. They post inspirational before-and-after photos, sell personal training programs, and pitch supplements promising rapid transformation.

But behind the six-packs and smiling selfies lies a far more dangerous reality.

Many of these influencers sell unregulated and untested products—from pre-workout powders laced with stimulants to steroids promoted as “natural hormone boosters.” Some fabricate their credentials.

Others steal transformation images or run fake coaching businesses using AI-generated testimonials.

The tragedy is evident in high-profile deaths:

• Jaxon Tippet, a well-known Australian fitness influencer, died of a heart attack in 2024 at just 30 years old. He had publicly battled steroid addiction and promoted various products on Instagram.

• Chris O’Donnell, also known as “Creeohdee,” took his life in 2025 after months of expressing mental health struggles linked to social media pressure and image obsession.

• Yanary Befort, a fitness coach, passed away in early 2025 due to complications from bowel cancer—after years of selling diet plans and fitness regimens online.

These aren’t just personal tragedies—they’re signals of a broken system, where deceit is rewarded, pressure is monetized, and followers learn that lying pays.

Scammers observe these influencers and mimic them. They learn how to build trust, create emotional hooks, and sell stories.

When they pivot to fraud—selling fake crypto, falsifying investment portfolios, or launching pyramid schemes—it’s just a change of costume, not of strategy.

LinkedIn: The Corporate Hunting Ground 

While TikTok and Instagram provide glamor, LinkedIn provides access.

For cybercriminals, LinkedIn is a goldmine of intelligence: job roles, contact lists, company hierarchies, tech stack tools, and even security vendors.

Every polished CV and open brag post offers social engineers a clearer map of how to exploit organizations.

According to a 2024 Tripwire report, LinkedIn is increasingly targeted for phishing and impersonation scams, particularly in the finance and tech sectors.

Criminals mimic recruiters or vendors, using cloned profiles and fake job offers to launch attacks. Some offer malware-laden PDFs disguised as business proposals.

Others build trust over weeks—chatting professionally before making the strike.

And the irony?

Many of these criminals learned their tone, language, and approach by scrolling the platform itself.

Why Fraud Is Now a Flex

The internet has rewired morality.

Today, deception isn’t just tolerated—it’s celebrated. People idolize influencers who become wealthy quickly, even if they later come under scrutiny.

Audiences admire audacity more than honesty. And in a gamified economy of likes, followers, and algorithmic rewards, cheating the system becomes a skill, not a sin.

Psychologically, this taps into a dopamine feedback loop. The same neurological high that makes social media addictive also makes deceptive behavior addictive, especially when rewarded publicly.

Studies from the American Psychological Association show that constant digital validation alters our moral compass, especially in young adults.

Add financial incentive to the mix, and it’s easy to see why crime has evolved into content.

Victims Train Their Attackers

In the age of oversharing, privacy isn’t breached—it’s volunteered.

People routinely post their:

• Daily routines

• Family members’ names

• Favorite brands

• Locations and travel itineraries

• Business deals and internal promotions

Each post contributes to the overall picture. Scammers use these to personalize attacks, guess passwords, or manipulate emotional context.

It’s not just individuals. Corporations post org charts, employee milestones, and infrastructure updates—giving cybercriminals exactly what they need to strike.

In effect, we’re building the playbook our attackers follow.

The Illusion of Safety in Numbers

One of the most dangerous lies of social media is that being part of a large digital crowd equals protection. But the opposite is true: it creates complacency. When we see others doing it, we assume it’s safe.

This herd behavior fuels a variety of fraudulent activities, from fake investment booms to viral health scams, and it has played a significant role in transforming Instagram and TikTok into sophisticated tools for fraudsters.

In professional settings, this manifests as trust in third-party vendors or partnerships that were only vetted via social networks—not formal due diligence.

We built the school.

The truth is stark: we didn’t just let this happen—we built the ecosystem that made it possible.

We built platforms that reward exaggeration. We created economies of attention. We normalized deceptive branding. And now, criminals are simply using those same mechanics better than most businesses do.

The fitness influencer lying about their supplement isn’t far removed from the scammer running a crypto Ponzi scheme—they both studied the same lessons:

1. Build trust.

2. Sell hope.

3. Fake proof.

4. Choose to withdraw when discovered or alternatively, rebrand and continue.

Conclusion: The Battle Ahead

As investigators, business leaders, and citizens, we can’t afford to be passive observers anymore.

Understanding how deception spreads is the first step.

But next, we must build resilience—teach digital hygiene, vet our sources, and challenge what we consume. Companies must train staff to spot social engineering not just in emails but also in DMs, comment threads, and influencer pitches.

Because the feed isn’t just where crime happens—it’s where it’s taught, practiced, and perfected.

If we want to stop the next wave of deception, we must first understand what we’ve helped design.